Great Platoons: 1914-1948
The concept is a very old one: alternating two players at a given position, one a lefthanded batter, the other a righthanded batter, on the basis of which arm the opposing team’s starting pitcher uses.
Platooning on this basis certainly wasn’t invented by Yankees manager Casey Stengel in the 1950s, though his liberal use and great success with the tactic was surely a leading factor in its blooming popularity in that period. Left-right platooning goes back to the early part of the 20th century, as outlined so well by Bill James in his Historical Baseball Abstract article, “A History of Platooning.”
Switch-hitting began as early as the 1870s, and, of course, where there is switch-hitting, there is a keen perception of the deep importance of the platoon advantage. By the 1900s, regular platoon arrangements began to appear in the major leagues, and by the 1910s the practice was quite common.
There are, of course, plenty of clever and sensible ways in which to alternate players beyond the strict left-right basis; Stengel in the 1950s, for example, brilliantly deployed multi-position platoon arrangements that took into account many factors beyond left-right. And regardless of their left-right focus, plenty of smart and successful platoon arrangements over the decades didn’t yield impressive offensive stats: Many good-field, little-hit types have been employed as platoon players.
But we’re going to keep it pretty simple here. What we’ll be exploring are more-or-less pure left-right platoon setups. Within those, we’re going to be giving the spotlight to the best hitters, regardless of their defensive and baserunning skills. We’re simply going to have some fun identifying those instances in which left-right platoon arrangements delivered the most robust offensive punch.
So, we’re going to concentrate on platoons that have most clearly met the following criteria:
– They must have been entirely or significantly structured upon the left-right-batting basis.
and
– Both platoon partners must have hit well, not just one or the other.
Something to remember as we proceed is this: Most pitchers are righthanded, usually by around two-thirds to one-third. So the signature aspect of the most strict left-right platoon partnership is that the lefthanded batter will get around twice as many plate appearances as the righthanded batter, give or take for particular circumstances.
Here we go!
1914 Boston Braves: Left field
The “Miracle Braves” were the sensation of baseball in 1914, thanks to their incredible second-half surge, and their stunning World Series sweep of Connie Mack’s heavily favored defending champion Athletics. Among the other features of those Braves was the significant degree of platooning presented by manager George Stallings, and it seems likely his prominent success with the tactic helped propel its growing popularity among managers.
In left field, then as now an offense-first position, Stallings got the biggest bang from his platooning buck: leveraging strong-hitting, defensively challenged journeyman Joe Connolly with obscure scrubeenie Ted Cather, and yielding abundant production.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Joe Connolly L 120 399 64 122 28 10 9 65 49 36 .306 .393 .494 164 Ted Cather R 50 145 19 43 11 2 0 27 7 28 .297 .338 .400 120 Total 544 83 165 39 12 9 92 56 64 .303 .381 .469 155
1915–16–17 Boston Red Sox: First base
First base in that era was still not particularly an offense-first position, as for a variety of reasons the defensive challenge and importance of first base were greater than they would later become. In 1915 Red Sox manager Bill Carrigan engineered a platoon between journeymen Dick Hoblitzel and Del Gainer, and found splendid success with it. Their combined OPS+ of 131 out of the first base position in that period was enormously valuable, and the Red Sox won 101 games and the pennant.
Carrigan maintained the platoon the following season, and though the offensive production of both Hoblitzel and Gainer dropped, that level of production from first base wasn’t the major problem it would be today, and the Red Sox repeated as champions.
Jack Barry replaced Carrigan as manager in 1917, but he left the first base arrangement just as it had been, and the platoon duo responded with another terrific performance. The left-right platoon had now been demonstrated as a platform that could deliver strong performance over a multi-year span.
1915:
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Dick Hoblitzel L 124 399 54 113 15 12 2 61 38 26 .283 .351 .396 127 Del Gainer R 82 200 30 59 5 8 1 29 21 31 .295 .371 .415 138 Total 599 84 172 20 20 3 90 59 57 .287 .358 .402 131
1916:
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Dick Hoblitzel L 130 417 57 108 17 1 0 39 47 28 .259 .338 .305 93 Del Gainer R 56 142 14 36 6 0 3 18 10 24 .254 .303 .359 99 Total 559 71 144 23 1 3 57 57 52 .258 .330 .318 95
1917:
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Dick Hoblitzel L 120 420 49 108 19 7 1 47 46 22 .257 .336 .343 108 Del Gainer R 52 172 28 53 10 2 2 19 15 21 .308 .374 .424 144 Total 592 77 161 29 9 3 66 61 43 .272 .348 .367 121
1921 Cleveland Indians: Right field
Tris Speaker had played under Carrigan for several years in Boston, and now as player-manager for the Indians, Speaker was an ardent platooner at several positions. Here’s the one from which he got the most remarkable production.
Yes, that Joe Wood is “Smokey Joe,” his once-sensational pitching career cut short by arm trouble, and now forging a second career as a hard-hitting corner outfielder.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Elmer Smith L 129 431 98 125 28 9 16 85 56 46 .290 .374 .508 121 Joe Wood R 66 194 32 71 16 5 4 60 25 17 .366 .438 .562 151 Total 625 130 196 44 14 20 145 81 63 .314 .396 .525 132
1921–22 New York Giants: Catcher
The great Giants manager John McGraw hadn’t been one of the earliest adopters of platooning, but by the 1920s he was among its more enthusiastic practitioners. This split of the catching duties wasn’t a full-fledged left-right platoon, as the righthanded-hitting Frank Snyder was getting most of the playing time. But Earl Smith was getting more plate appearances than he would have as just a normal backup catcher; it’s clear that “Oil” was getting the playing time against the toughest righthanders.
1921:
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Frank Snyder R 108 309 36 99 13 2 8 45 27 24 .320 .382 .453 120 Earl Smith L 89 229 35 77 8 4 10 51 27 8 .336 .409 .537 148 Total 538 71 176 21 6 18 96 54 32 .327 .394 .489 134
1922:
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Frank Snyder R 104 318 34 109 21 5 5 51 23 25 .343 .387 .487 123 Earl Smith L 90 234 29 65 11 4 9 39 37 12 .278 .383 .474 119 Total 552 63 174 32 9 14 90 60 37 .315 .385 .482 121
1922 New York Giants: Center field
Stengel plainly didn’t invent platooning: he was himself extensively platooned throughout his playing career, and here was paired up by McGraw with a productive partner in Bill Cunningham.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Casey Stengel L 84 250 48 92 8 10 7 48 21 17 .368 .436 .564 155 Bill Cunningham R 85 229 37 75 15 2 2 33 7 9 .328 .350 .437 101 Total 479 85 167 23 12 9 81 28 26 .349 .401 .503 135
1921–22–23–24 Detroit Tigers: Catcher
The Tigers’ manager through these years was none other than Ty Cobb, and here he invoked an extraordinarily elegant platoon pairing: Bassler–Woodall remains the longest-lasting and most consistently productive left-right catcher platoon in history.
1921:
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Johnny Bassler L 119 388 37 119 18 5 0 56 58 16 .307 .401 .379 101 Larry Woodall R 46 80 10 29 4 1 0 14 6 7 .363 .407 .438 116 Total 468 47 148 22 6 0 70 64 23 .316 .402 .389 104
1922:
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Johnny Bassler L 121 372 41 120 14 0 0 41 62 12 .323 .422 .360 108 Larry Woodall R 50 125 19 43 2 2 0 18 8 11 .344 .388 .392 106 Total 497 60 163 16 2 0 59 70 23 .328 .415 .368 108
1923:
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Johnny Bassler L 135 383 45 114 12 3 0 49 76 13 .298 .414 .345 103 Larry Woodall R 71 148 20 41 12 2 1 19 22 9 .277 .371 .405 106 Total 531 65 155 24 5 1 68 98 22 .292 .403 .362 104
1924:
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Johnny Bassler L 124 379 43 131 20 3 1 68 62 11 .346 .441 .422 125 Larry Woodall R 67 165 23 51 9 2 0 25 21 5 .309 .387 .388 102 Total 544 66 182 29 5 1 93 83 16 .335 .426 .412 119
1925 Philadelphia Athletics: Second base
Connie Mack didn’t do a lot of platooning, but he seems to have done so on a fairly regular basis with “Camera Eye” Bishop. Whether it was a function of Bishop not hitting lefthanders well, or just being the sort who needed periodic rest, Mack never played Bishop fulltime, always giving one or another righthanded hitter a meaningful role in Bishop’s support.
Mack deployed the versatile Jimmy Dykes as an infield supersub, in the lineup most days but without a regular position. The line we see for Dykes below shows his 1925 full-season stats prorated to the 58 games he played at second base. The combined OPS+ of 104 between Bishop and Dykes was then, as it would be now, quite good production from second base.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Max Bishop L 105 368 66 103 18 4 4 27 87 37 .280 .420 .383 99 Jimmy Dykes R 58 221 44 71 15 5 2 26 22 23 .323 .393 .471 112 Total 589 110 174 33 9 6 53 109 60 .296 .411 .416 104
1925 Pittsburgh Pirates: First base
A modern player with quite a bit in common with George Grantham would be Todd Walker: A second baseman with such defensive limitations that he winds up playing quite a bit of first base, but swinging a sweet lefthanded bat wherever he plays. Here Grantham was paired by manager Bill McKechnie (who in his playing days had, tellingly, been a switch-hitter) with the veteran Stuffy McInnis. Together, they delivered a lot of value as the Pirates won the pennant.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ George Grantham L 114 359 74 117 24 6 8 52 50 29 .326 .413 .493 124 Stuffy McInnis R 59 155 19 57 10 4 0 24 17 1 .368 .437 .484 129 Total 514 93 174 34 10 8 76 67 30 .339 .420 .490 126
1925 Philadelphia Phillies: Right field
Cy Williams was one of those guys who, it seemed, the older he got, the better hitter he became. Here he was 37, and no longer capable of full-time play, but quite capable of being a first-rate platoon partner.
It should be noted that the journeyman Johnny Mokan usually played left field, and Phillies manager Art Fletcher slid either George Harper or George Burns over to take Williams’ place in right.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Cy Williams L 107 314 78 104 11 5 13 60 53 34 .331 .435 .522 135 Johnny Mokan R 75 209 30 69 11 2 6 42 27 9 .330 .417 .488 122 Total 523 108 173 22 7 19 102 80 43 .331 .428 .509 130
1928 St. Louis Cardinals: Right feld
Bill McKechnie was now managing the Cardinals, and here he continued the platooning tendency he’d demonstrated in Pittsburgh.
Harper was generally a platoon player throughout his career, and a very good-hitting one, a stocky little guy with outstanding power. Here McKechnie matched him with the rookie Wally Roettger, and coaxed near-career-best performance from both outfielders. “Deacon Bill” captured his second National League pennant.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ George Harper L 99 272 41 83 8 2 17 58 51 15 .305 .418 .537 146 Wally Roettger R 68 261 27 89 17 4 6 44 10 22 .341 .372 .506 126 Total 533 68 172 25 6 23 102 61 37 .323 .398 .522 138
1930 St. Louis Cardinals: Left field/Right field
By 1930 McKechnie was gone from St. Louis, now managing the Braves. But new Cardinals manager Gabby Street outdid McKechnie in deploying a complex rotation among four guys between the corner outfield spots. Note that between them the lefthanded hitters George Watkins and George “Showboat” Fisher got most of the plate appearances. It obviously wasn’t a pure left-right arrangement, as Chick Hafey (who was a very fine player but never really an established regular; his Hall of Fame status is hysterically wrong) played a lot against righthanders, and the robust-hitting veteran Ray Blades was often kept in reserve even against lefties.
Note as well that even though this was the 1930 National League, the highest-scoring environment in the entire 20th century, the gaudy figures in the OPS+ column demonstrate that these fellows were delivering genuinely sensational offense. Rack up another pennant for GM Branch Rickey’s Cardinals.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Chick Hafey R 120 446 108 150 39 12 26 107 46 51 .336 .407 .652 148 George Watkins L 119 391 85 146 32 7 17 87 24 49 .373 .415 .621 143 Showboat Fisher L 92 254 49 95 18 6 8 61 25 21 .374 .432 .587 140 Ray Blades R 45 101 26 40 6 2 4 25 21 15 .396 .504 .614 165 Total/2 596 134 216 48 14 28 140 58 68 .362 .426 .625 147
In the 1930s, the practice of platooning suddenly and dramatically declined. Exactly why this happened isn’t obvious, but two possibilities seem apparent.
The first was structural: As a cost-cutting measure in response to the Great Depression, the major league roster size was reduced in the early 1930s. A shorter bench necessarily inhibits the flexibility of managers to platoon. The second, obviously more speculative, is cultural: There might have been a backlash against the practice of platooning that had become so widespread in the 1920s.
In every era there has been a school of thought that asserts platooning isn’t really the “right” way to play the game; platooning has often been vaguely seen as fussy, overly complicated, rather effete. If a player can’t hit both righthanded and lefthanded pitching equally well, so goes this argument, then he shouldn’t be in the lineup anyway. It may be that the mindset among managers swung in the direction that platooning wasn’t respectable, and this fashion prevailed through most of the 1930s.
1931 St. Louis Cardinals: First base
These Cardinals instances may or may not have been left-right platoon situations. Both simply may have been cases of a young player gradually taking over for a veteran over the course of the season: the rookie Ripper Collins easing out the veteran star Jim Bottomley in 1931 …
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Jim Bottomley L 108 382 73 133 34 5 9 75 34 34 .348 .403 .534 146 Ripper Collins B 89 279 34 84 20 10 4 59 18 24 .301 .350 .487 119 Total 661 107 217 54 15 13 134 52 58 .328 .383 .514 136
1936 St. Louis Cardinals: First base
… and the now-32-year-old Collins in turn passing the baton to the rookie Johnny Mize in ’36. On the other hand, the very fact that Collins was a switch-hitter is prima facie evidence that his team was acutely sensitive to the platoon advantage.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Johnny Mize L 97 383 70 126 28 7 18 86 46 30 .329 .402 .577 161 Ripper Collins B 61 241 42 71 13 3 11 42 42 26 .292 .399 .509 143 Total 624 112 196 41 10 29 128 88 56 .315 .401 .551 154
But though platooning was almost absent through most of the 1930s, it gradually began to reappear.
Witness the two cases below. Neither was a pure left-right platoon, but they both included much of that element. And both became prominent, and rather controversial, situations.
At that time, the qualifying rule for each league’s batting average championship—a very big deal in those days—wasn’t based on a player’s times at bat, but on his having played in at least 100 games. The assumption was that any player in 100 games would amass at least 400 or so at-bats, and thus his batting average could be reasonably compared against those of the league’s regulars. That assumption clearly didn’t anticipate the frequent in-game substitutions associated with platoon arrangements.
1938 Washington Senators: Right field
Taffy Wright’s .350 average was the highest in his league among players in 100 or more games. But Wright, with 100 games exactly, barely qualified, and his pinch-hit-heavy usage had him falling far short of the number of plate appearances typical of batting champions.
The American League arbitrarily ruled that he didn’t deserve the batting crown. The league asserted that the qualifying rule was actually 400 at-bats, although, for reasons unexplained, the league had never actually, you know, said so. Until now. On this basis, the league awarded the title to Jimmie Foxx (who hit .349) instead.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ George Case R 107 433 69 132 27 3 2 40 39 28 .305 .362 .395 95 Taffy Wright L 100 263 37 92 18 10 2 36 13 17 .350 .389 .517 132 Total 696 106 224 45 13 4 76 52 45 .322 .372 .441 112
1940 Pittsburgh Pirates: Third base
Debs Garms’ average was also the best in his league, with 358 at-bats. Having played in 103 games, Garms was declared his league’s champ, but in the wake of the Wright decision his status was seen as rather flimsy.
The Wright-Garms situations led both the American and National Leagues in 1944 to adopt a qualifying standard of 2.6 at-bats per team game (400 at-bats for a 154-game season; in 1957 it would be changed to 3.1 plate appearances, in reaction to the Bobby Avila–Ted Williams batting crown controversy of 1954). The leagues’ addressing of the issue recognized that teams could now be expected to deploy high-performing hitters in roles that would limit their times at bat to significantly fewer than those of a full-time regular—in other words, platoon roles. Though platooning had taken a siesta, it had reawakened, and was now being accommodated as part of the normal scene.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Debs Garms L 103 358 76 127 23 7 5 57 23 6 .355 .395 .500 146 Lee Handley R 98 302 50 85 7 4 1 19 27 16 .281 .340 .341 89 Total 660 126 212 30 11 6 76 50 22 .321 .372 .427 126
1941 New York Yankees: Catcher
When I was a kid in the 1960s, Bill Dickey was petty much universally presented by the pundits as the greatest catcher in history. That was an egregious overrating, of course, but the recalibration in recent decades has tended to err too far in the opposite direction, and present Dickey as just a very good catcher. He was in fact a great player: by all accounts a fine defensive receiver, a highly productive hitter with very good power, and remarkably durable and consistent. Dickey was, in many respects, a very comparable talent to a modern Yankee who, oddly, seems quite underrated: Jorge Posada.
In Dickey’s later career, manager Joe McCarthy adroitly phased him out of his regular role by pairing him with righthanded-hitting catchers in platoon arrangements. In this season, partner Buddy Rosar hit nearly as well as Dickey.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Bill Dickey L 109 348 35 99 15 5 7 71 45 17 .284 .371 .417 109 Buddy Rosar R 67 209 25 60 17 2 1 36 22 10 .287 .355 .402 101 Total 557 60 159 32 7 8 107 67 27 .285 .365 .411 106
1944 Chicago Cubs: Left field
While the shortages of World War II might have made platooning a problematic concept, the ’44 Cubs, at least, took the opportunity to leverage a couple of good-bit-limited talents. Outside of the war years, “Dim Dom” Dallessandro and Lou “The Mad Russian” Novikoff were colorful and popular longtime minor leaguers.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Dom Dallessandro L 117 381 53 116 19 4 8 74 61 29 .304 .400 .438 137 Lou Novikoff R 71 139 15 39 4 2 3 19 10 11 .281 .329 .403 106 Total 520 68 155 23 6 11 93 71 40 .298 .385 .429 131
1946 Boston Braves: Left field
In the immediate post-war period, many teams suddenly had a welcome problem on their hands: how best to accommodate a sudden surplus of equivalently talented players. Platooning was an obvious solution, and its prevalence mushroomed in the late 1940s.
Danny Litwhiler was an outstanding hitter, and had been a regular in the early part of the decade. But he didn’t provide much defense or speed, so a couple of National League teams made good use of him as a platoon player over the second half of his career.
(Despite his lackluster defensive reputation, Litwhiler was the first regular major league outfielder to record an errorless season, in 1942. Of course, in 1941, he’d led all major league outfielders in errors, with 15.)
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Bama Rowell L 95 293 37 82 12 6 3 31 29 15 .280 .345 .392 108 Danny Litwhiler R 79 247 29 72 12 2 8 38 19 23 .291 .347 .453 125 Total 540 66 154 24 8 11 69 48 38 .285 .346 .420 116
1947 Boston Braves: First base
This one might be seen as something close to The Perfect Platoon. It was almost completely pure in its left-right two-thirds-to-one-third dimension, and matched two players of nearly equal ability, but entirely complementary skillsets: the patient, power-hitting rookie Earl Torgeson with the free-swinging, line-drive-hitting veteran Frank McCormick.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Earl Torgeson L 128 399 73 112 20 6 16 78 82 59 .281 .403 .481 136 Frank McCormick R 81 212 24 75 18 2 2 43 11 8 .354 .386 .486 132 Total 611 97 187 38 8 18 121 93 67 .306 .398 .483 135
1947 St. Louis Cardinals: Right field
Like Litwhiler, Ron Northey came up with the Phillies in the early 1940s, and established himself as a fine-hitting regular corner outfielder. But Northey was sort of a lefthanded-hitting version of Litwhiler: His best position was batter’s box. So Northey as well spent several years delivering value as a platoon player, and eventually became deployed as a pure pinch-hitting specialist.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Ron Northey L 110 311 52 91 19 3 15 63 48 29 .293 .391 .518 135 Joe Medwick R 75 150 19 46 12 0 4 28 16 12 .307 .373 .467 118 Total 461 71 137 31 3 19 91 64 41 .297 .385 .501 130
1948 New York Yankees: Left field
Please note that this is the season before Casey Stengel took over as Yankees manager. Here his predecessor Bucky Harris wasn’t deploying a pure left-right platoon, but that may be a function of the sore-backed Charlie Keller’s need for frequent time off at this stage of his career.
Player B G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Johnny Lindell R 88 309 58 98 17 2 13 55 35 50 .317 .387 .511 139 Charlie Keller L 83 247 41 66 15 2 6 44 41 25 .267 .372 .417 110 Total 556 99 164 32 4 19 99 76 75 .295 .380 .469 127
Next installment
We enter the 1950s, and platooning becomes far more pervasive than ever before.
Many years after the shooting, I see you missed one. 1935 Tigers. Mickey Cochrane platooned himself with Ray Hayworth behind the plate.