Have the Twins Found an Ace in Kenta Maeda?

The Twins may have found a top-of-the-rotation arm in Kenta Maeda. (via Arturo Pardavila III)
All it took to complete the long-anticipated Mookie Betts trade was the inclusion of David Price, half of his $96 million, three-year contract, a week’s worth of hand-wringing over failed medicals, and the disillusionment of an entire fanbase. In the end, Betts and Price are officially members of the Los Angeles Dodgers, while Alex Verdugo, Jeter Downs, and Connor Wong are headed to the East Coast. This blockbuster has transformed what was already a superteam into a potentially historic juggernaut in the coming season while simultaneously serving as a dour commentary on baseball’s flawed incentive structure.
The Minnesota Twins, as they often do, find themselves on the periphery of other, bigger-market clubs’ activities. Unable to iron out an agreement with Boston’s suddenly-circumspect front office, the Twins will now be sending Brusdar Graterol (along with outfielder Luke Raley) to the Dodgers in exchange for swingman Kenta Maeda and catcher Jair Camargo. While the majority of the media attention has been focused on Betts and the implications this trade has for his impending free agency, some consideration should be given to Maeda’s new employment situation.
During his tenure as a Dodger, the versatile Maeda found himself relegated to the bullpen with increasing frequency. Between 2016 and 2017, he started in 57 of his 61 games (93.4%), while in 2018 and 2019 he occupied that role in only 46 of the 76 games (60.5%) that featured him. Furthermore, the Dodgers saw fit to limit him to 5.31 innings per start during the latter period, likely in an effort to “manage his workload,” avoid the third-time-through-the-order penalty, and distribute innings to other members of their loaded pitching staff.
It goes without saying that the Twins do not possess the Dodgers’ pitching depth and should have no qualms about slotting Maeda into their starting rotation immediately and permanently. He will join returners José Berríos and Jake Odorizzi at the top, with some pairing of Homer Bailey, Randy Dobnak, Devin Smeltzer, and Lewis Thorpe in the four and five spots to start the season.
Michael Pineda presumably will reclaim his old job when he returns from his PED suspension in May, and Rich Hill figures to receive some consideration if and when he completes his recovery from offseason elbow surgery. If things become desperate enough that Jhoulys Chacín (who is currently signed to a minor-league contract with an invitation to spring training) gets a shot a starting, Minnesota’s on-field issues likely will extend beyond a single pitcher’s performance. That said, the acquisition of Maeda should go a long way toward improving the Twins’ ability to prevent runs.
Maeda’s primary arsenal consists of a four-seam fastball, a slider, and a change-up. He also features a curveball (typically used as a surprise pitch to open an at-bat) and a sinker. The slider, thrown a career-high 31.5% of the time in 2019, is his money pitch, posting an 18.5 pVAL and a 36.8% called-strike-plus whiff (CSW) rate last season. (To learn more about the predictive power of CSW rate, check out Alex Fast’s FSWA Award-winning article.)
For context, Patrick Corbin’s exceptional slide piece generated a 21.3 pVAL and a 37.0% CSW rate last season. The difference between Maeda’s and Corbin’s sliders lies in their respective deployment frequencies; Maeda threw his slider 31.5% of the time last season, while Corbin leaned on his a remarkable 37.1% of the time. (Jakob Junis and Clayton Kershaw were the only qualified starters to throw a higher percentage of sliders than Corbin did in 2019.)
Maeda’s secondary pitch, his change-up, also proved itself to be an effective offering, checking in with a respectable 4.2 pVAL and a 28.5% CSW rate. Though he primarily used the change-up to attack left-handed hitters (87.7% of his change-ups came with a southpaw at the plate), it’s also demonstrated an effectiveness against righties in a limited sample size, with 147 pitches thrown across 2018 and 2019 generating a 26.5% CSW rate, a 0.228 wOBA, and a 0.161 xwOBA. I would like to see Maeda be less discriminant with the pitch in 2020, as a more versatile third offering should prevent batters from adjusting to Maeda in their second and third looks at him.
The weakest link in Maeda’s arsenal is his fastball, which was hit to the tune of a 0.386 wOBA and a -0.7 pVAL last season. That’s the bad news. There are, however, reasons to be optimistic about the pitch’s future: Its 0.357 xwOBA in 2019 suggests bad luck may be partially to blame for its poor results last season. Even more encouraging is that Maeda seemed to recognize he should be less fastball-reliant while simultaneously finding a little extra oomph to put behind it down the stretch. The end result was a vastly-improved heater in the second half.
Date Range | % of Pitches | Avg. Effective Pitch Velocity (MPH) | CSW% | Avg. Spin Rate (RPM) | xwOBA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before 9/12 | 35.2 | 91.49 | 32.5 | 2271 | 0.389 |
After 9/12 | 25.2 | 92.46 | 30.0 | 2313 | 0.318 |
It’s not rocket science: A fastball that’s thrown harder (and with more “rise”) should be harder to hit with authority. The fact that Maeda was able to make these improvements in his outings as a starter suggests that he can maintain them as a member of the Twins rotation. If this flashy new toy sticks around, it will give Maeda three viable options for attacking hitters in 2020.
Quietly, Maeda’s arsenal has generated some of the best results in the game. Last season, only eight starters were more proficient at inducing productive strikes than Maeda.
Rank | Player | Total Pitches | CSW% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gerrit Cole | 3362 | 35.7% |
2 | Max Scherzer | 2270 | 34.3% |
3 | Chris Sale | 2466 | 34.4% |
4 | Justin Verlander | 3448 | 34.0% |
5 | Mike Clevinger | 2090 | 33.8% |
6 | Shane Bieber | 3332 | 33.1% |
7 | Charlie Morton | 3139 | 32.7% |
8 | Lucas Giolito | 2814 | 32.6% |
9 | Kenta Maeda | 2433 | 32.5% |
10 | Aaron Nola | 3332 | 32.3% |
While I’m not saying Maeda is on the same level as a Gerrit Cole or a Max Scherzer, the names on this list are undoubtedly good company for a pitcher to find himself in—assuming his goal is to rack up strikeouts and avoid walks. What about inducing weak contact? Maeda has you covered there, too:
Rank | Player | BBE | Avg. Exit Velocity (MPH) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ryan Yarbrough | 416 | 84.1 |
2 | Kyle Hendricks | 538 | 85.2 |
3 | Hyun-Jin Ryu | 532 | 85.3 |
4 | Kenta Maeda | 400 | 85.4 |
5 | Martín Pérez | 532 | 85.4 |
6 | Eduardo Rodriguez | 564 | 85.7 |
7 | Jacob deGrom | 498 | 85.8 |
8 | Mike Clevinger | 291 | 86.1 |
9 | Jack Flaherty | 479 | 86.1 |
10 | Zack Wheeler | 580 | 86.2 |
Put it all together, and you’ve got a tried-and-true recipe for a stifled offense.
Rank | Player | TBF | wOBA | xwOBA | Diff. | ERA- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gerrit Cole | 817 | .246 | .238 | .008 | 56 |
2 | Justin Verlander | 847 | .243 | .249 | -.006 | 58 |
3 | Jacob deGrom | 804 | .250 | .253 | -.003 | 59 |
4 | Max Scherzer | 693 | .269 | .254 | .015 | 65 |
5 | Mike Clevinger | 499 | .261 | .264 | -.003 | 56 |
6 | Stephen Strasburg | 841 | .265 | .266 | -.001 | 74 |
7 | Kenta Maeda | 624 | .274 | .274 | .000 | 96 |
8 | Charlie Morton | 790 | .270 | .275 | -.005 | 69 |
9 | Walker Buehler | 737 | .270 | .275 | -.005 | 78 |
10 | Chris Paddack | 568 | .268 | .275 | -.007 | 78 |
Those are some men who are very good at throwing baseballs. I’ve included ERA- in the table as well, which shows Maeda ultimately was less successful from a pure run-prevention standpoint than the other pitchers named above. That’s not to say Maeda is incapable of pitching to their level in the future, or his inclusion on this list is some sort of fluke.
The reason I cited CSW rate, exit velocity, and xwOBA in writing this profile is all three of these statistics correlate strongly to future performance as well as past performance. In other words, a pitcher with below-average results that grades out as above-average in any one of these categories may be on the verge of a breakout. That Maeda stands out as well-above-average (elite, even) in all three is extremely encouraging for a pitcher who has already proven himself to be a quality major league starter.
As spring training gets underway, the Twins look to be one of the premier offenses in baseball. If Maeda can put it all together and pitch to the sum of his parts, Minnesota may have one of the better rotations in the game to back up the Bomba squad. Only time will tell.
Huh. Watched him his whole career in LA. He goes from dominant to tentative from start to start, but usually looked very strong as a RP.
I have questions about fastball volume more generally too that might make him more effective. It seems like the Twins are pretty far ahead of the curve in suppressing fastball usage?
Thank you for the input; I hadn’t considered that! I did a quick Statcast search to see which teams increased/decreased their collective fastball usages the most from 2018 to 2019 (the years between which the Twins transitioned to Wes Johnson as their pitching coach and Rocco Baldelli as their manager). The Twins did decrease their fastball usage from 59.3% in 2018 to 57.2% in 2019; however, because league-wide fastball usage decreased as well (from 60.1% to 58.4%), the Twins actually moved from the 13th-most fastball-reliant team to the 12th. I do think that the Twins new front office and coaching staff are pretty forward-thinking, and I would speculate that their general philosophy is for their pitchers to throw their best pitches more often, regardless of type. In 2019, the Twins had a number of starters (Berríos, Odorizzi, Pérez) and relievers (Rogers, May, Duffey) that could claim a fastball of some type as one of their betters offerings. Hence, more hard stuff from the team as a whole!
I’m hopeful that (1) the Twins can identify Maeda’s best pitches (his slider and his changeup) and encourage him to throw those pitches most frequently, like they seem to have done with their other pitchers, and (2) continue to improve a fastball that showed a lot of promise in the second half of 2019!
One reason his results are so positive is because of how the Dodgers utilized him. In addition to shielding him from a 3rd time through the order and putting him in the bullpen on occasion where his stuff plays up, they also limited his BP appearances to RvR matchups. He’s truly dominant against righties but get walloped by lefties. This is problematic when starting against teams that can load their lineups with LHB.
Maeda’s a nice pitcher to have in the middle of the rotation, but I’m not sure there’s potential ace here, as Dodgers did a nice job masking his flaws.
You may be right! Maeda was definitely less effective against lefties last season, giving up a .319 wOBA compared to a .229 wOBA against righties. This suggests that he might fare better in a bullpen roll, where he can be deployed selectively against right-handed hitters. That said, there are a few things that make me optimistic about Maeda’s future effectiveness as a starter. For one, his lefty/righty splits were still perfectly acceptable for a major league starting pitcher—Max Scherzer had a nearly identical .319/.223 split last season in about twenty more innings than Maeda. Also, the Dodgers didn’t really treat him as a ROOGY after moving him to the bullpen for the final month of the season (he faced 33 righties and 26 lefties during this time period), so they seemed to be at least somewhat comfortable with him facing opposite-handed batters.
What really gets me excited is that Maeda (as a starter) allowed an xwOBA of .313 to lefties last season, and this number actually dropped to .264 in the second half thanks to that improved fastball. (Lefties posted a .449 xwOBA against the pitch in the first half, but only managed a .267 mark against it in his second-half starts!) My initial assumption was that, in using him out of the bullpen from time to time, the Dodgers were giving his arm the rest it needed to add that extra mile per hour to his fastball when he did toe the mound as a starter. However, there’s a pretty clear delineation between Maeda’s time in the starting rotation and his time in the bullpen. He pitched 26 of his 27 March-through-August games as a starter and all ten of his September games as a reliever, so I don’t think this explains the second-half fastball velocity in his starts. I also considered extra days of rest between starts and pitch limitations as possible explanations; however, he actually averaged fewer days of rest between starts in the second half of the season (5.88 days compared to 6.16 in the first half), and his average pitch count per game stayed about the same (87 in the first half, 85 in the second). My best guess is that, by using the fastball more sparingly in his starts, Maeda was able to conserve his energy for when he actually did bust out a heater. I also noticed that he became more consistent at locating his fastball at the top of the zone against lefties in the second half, which would make that extra velocity play up even more.
Maybe all of this is just a flash in the pan. But, if the extra velo sticks around, Maeda should have a solid three-pitch mix to attack hitters with three times through the order. I’m hopeful that he can make it work (if we ever play baseball again)!