Detailed standings at the all-star break
A couple of times a week, I download a bunch of baseball stats into Excel and generate my own standings table. Since we’re at the official All-Star break thingie, I thought I’d inflict my standings format on you:
7/11/2012 Win Probability Added American League East Temp RS RA PWins Diff Close Bat Starters Bullpen NYY 52 33 .612 103 412 347 49 3 22-13 4.90 0.96 3.65 BAL 45 40 .529 54 351 387 39 6 29-13 -2.72 -2.56 7.78 TBR 45 41 .523 66 363 359 43 2 21-21 1.22 -1.58 2.35 TOR 43 43 .500 65 430 408 45 -2 11-19 2.40 -3.30 0.90 BOS 43 43 .500 60 432 389 47 -4 17-21 -0.82 -1.38 2.20 American League Central CHW 47 38 .553 93 409 346 49 -2 19-22 2.40 2.54 -0.44 CLE 44 41 .518 75 385 414 40 4 23-14 2.56 -3.29 2.23 DET 44 42 .512 99 387 381 44 0 24-24 0.47 -0.45 0.97 KCR 37 47 .440 53 344 385 38 -1 21-22 -4.75 -3.25 3.00 MIN 36 49 .424 69 354 441 34 2 20-18 -0.96 -9.82 4.29 American League West TEX 52 34 .605 82 443 364 51 1 18-17 -0.61 2.84 6.77 LAA 48 38 .558 91 378 334 48 0 19-18 4.96 -0.18 0.22 OAK 43 43 .500 93 319 316 43 0 22-20 -3.82 2.71 1.12 SEA 36 51 .414 52 337 365 40 -4 17-27 -4.34 -2.03 -1.13 Win Probability Added National League East Temp RS RA PWins Diff Close Bat Starters Bullpen WSN 49 34 .590 84 348 290 48 1 24-24 2.98 2.63 1.89 ATL 46 39 .541 89 391 357 46 0 22-16 4.42 -2.93 2.02 NYM 46 40 .535 74 394 374 45 1 22-16 5.55 1.13 -3.69 MIA 41 44 .482 66 334 390 36 5 24-22 1.13 -1.35 -1.28 PHI 37 50 .425 32 368 396 41 -4 16-21 -0.21 -1.92 -4.37 National League Central PIT 48 37 .565 105 345 313 46 2 28-19 1.34 -1.34 5.50 CIN 47 38 .553 82 358 316 47 0 21-21 1.73 1.93 0.84 STL 46 40 .535 92 426 356 50 -4 14-21 3.65 2.18 -2.83 MIL 40 45 .471 78 384 393 42 -2 19-24 1.26 -0.73 -3.03 CHC 33 52 .388 81 317 386 35 -2 15-24 -4.01 -1.70 -3.78 HOU 33 53 .384 35 344 416 35 -2 17-24 -5.82 -3.17 -1.01 National League West LAD 47 40 .540 48 332 322 45 2 24-21 1.35 0.13 2.02 SFG 46 40 .535 56 338 346 42 4 29-19 5.15 -2.06 -0.09 ARI 42 43 .494 75 375 365 44 -2 17-21 0.20 0.12 -0.82 SDP 34 53 .391 72 305 381 35 -1 19-26 -2.42 -6.90 -0.18 COL 33 52 .388 59 413 479 36 -3 14-20 -0.08 -6.82 -2.60
Not that big a deal, really. You’ve got your wins and losses, temperature (based on the Bill James formula that measures how hot a team is–room temperature is “normal”), runs scored and allowed, pythagorean wins (based on runs scored and allowed), the team’s record in close games (those decided by one or two runs) and Win Probability Added attributed to the offense, starting pitchers and relievers. Your standard sabermetric stuff, but stuff that isn’t typically listed together.
These are all macro-level numbers, but you can use them to see what’s going on. The Orioles have substantially beat their pythagorean record by winning close games (hence, the outrageous WPA posted by the bullpen). But they’re kind of cold right now, and that particular ship appears to be sinking. The Dodgers are even colder, despite leading the National League West. Their starters haven’t contributed a lot, though they’re still the best in the West.
Can the Pirates keep it up? They’re the hottest team in baseball right now, in first place to boot. But their bullpen has the third-highest total in the majors and they’ve had a fine record in close games. They’re one of the best stories in the league right now, but the signs point to danger ahead.
The Phillies? In last place. Cold, cold. The most dramatic offense in the majors belongs to the Mets (comebacks!) but they also have one of the worst bullpens. The Marlins are about even in close games, but five games ahead of their pythagorean record. That implies that they’ve lost their blowout games. Actually (looking it up), it’s true! The Marlins are 3-13 in games decided by five more more runs.
The Rangers’ bullpen has been wildly good, but Texas hasn’t won more than their share of close games. What’s up with that? Oakland’s starters have contributed more to their WPA than anyone else. The White Sox are solidly in first place, but are the Tigers stirring? Their temperature is higher than it’s been since mid-April. And check out the difference in WPA between the Twins’ starters and relievers.
If you’d like, find your own stories in the numbers. And let’s play ball.
You must have made a mistake. The Mo-less Yanks bullpen is 5th in MLB. And the Papelbon-filled Phillies bullpen is last.
Texas and Boston, 1st and 2nd in runs scored, but negative WPA from their offense? Giants, 2nd in offense WPA, but 24th in runs soored?
WPA measures the TIMING of those runs. That’s the purpose of WPA. It describes when runs are scored.
If you don’t care for that, just use runs scored. And if a team bunches runs into a blowout, then it’ll help their total runs scored, but won’t help their WPA.
Use whatever it is you need.
What Tango said. That’s exactly the reason for including both figures. Together, they tell a fuller story.
Want to know why the Giants are winning close games? Check the WPA. It’s the offense.
Interesting to me that among teams with 4 or more difference between their pythagorean record and their actual W-L record there isn’t a very strong correlation between that result and the bullpen WPA. I thought that bullpen WPA would explain more of that difference, but it’s really just one component. For a team such as MIA, it’s clutch hitting apparently.
Thanks, studes. Love anything you post.
The light just went on and I finally see the point of WPA. Thanks studes.