Blind resume

All stats current through June 29.

Brand names are very powerful. Companies pay big money to develop them because they create loyalty and act as a shorthand signal for certain aspects and qualities. Brand-building is not a simple task; it is slow and costly.

However, once a brand-reputation is developed, it becomes “sticky.” That is to say that once people have a certain perception of a brand, it is hard to shake that perception, even if the underlying realities no longer reflect the reputation.

This is why struggling companies (see Circuit City) are often able to sell off their brand name rights (and why other companies want to buy such), and it is also why once-popular or high-quality brand names often retain their “value” despite a drop in the quality of the signaled product (at least in the short, and often medium, term).

Because brand names are really social/commercial means, they are powerful communicative tools. They are also, however, a great source of inefficiency in buying value. It costs more money to get the information/do the research up front and in the short term, but in the long run the dollar cost on non-brand products tends to be substantially lower despite comparable value.

Take, for instance, batteries. It costs roughly $5.00 per four pack of AAA or AA Ultra Alkaline batteries by the brand names (Duracell, Enegergizer), while the generic Ultra Alkaline brand at Walgreens costs $2.99 for four of the same. Did you know, however, that Walgreens’ batteries are made by one of the brand companies? Walgreens just pays to rebrand the batteries with its generic house label. Same production, different costs to consumer.

You need to do a little extra research to discover this, which itself is arguably a cost that offsets any short-term gains, but in the long run, this research pays off.

So what does this have to do with fantasy baseball? Like batteries, fantasy players build brand name reputations. We talk about certain players as being 20/20 guys, high-average hitters, etc.

These reputations usually reflect past production more than present/future production. How often do you hear someone say that player X has to bounce back? Sometimes that’s are correct and current numbers are depressed by poor luck, but sometimes poor present production is also the byproduct of skill erosion or other declines in peripherals that are attributable to more than just random noise.

Particularly, once we cross the fantasy-relevant statistical thresholds (for hitters, see this article, while for pitchers, see this article), it is pertinent to re-evaluate our preconceived notions, particularly if you want to capture that “Extra 2 percent” in fantasy.

Long introductions aside, let’s play blind resume. What follows are the statistics of an unnamed outfielder whose identity will not be revealed until the very end of this article. (Don’t cheat!). His stats come from the entirety of his tenure on his present team (over 1,000 plate appearances). Let’s dub him “Player X” for the purpose of this article.

First, Player X’s aggregate statistics. Over his time on his present team, Player X has hit a cumulative .254/.302/.398 (.700 OPS) that has been good for a wOBA of .306, which is 16 percent below average (84 wRC+).

Scaled per 650 plate appearances, Player X’s production rates per season come out to 18 home runs, 26.5 stolen bases, 82.5 runs, and 71 RBI. His fielding has been roughly league average over his career with his present team, during which he has amassed just under +1.50 WAR per 650 plate appearances.

Now, this player’s BABIP with his current team is only a cumulative .272, compared to a career BABIP of .310 and a current-team xBABIP of .325, but he is no spring chicken, and on the tail end of his prime (no longer in his 20s) at best. This player does not walk very much (approximately 6.5 percent walk rate), but also does not strike out very much (14.3 percent strikeout clip).

Knowing just the above, what is the most you would pay for this player at auction? (Assume a $260 budget, 12-team mixed league, with two catchers, corner and middle infielder requirements, and five outfielders.)

Would you rather have this person than Vernon Wells (on a .219 batting average, 30 home run, five stolen base, 93 runs, 80 RBI pace this year) or Jason Bay (.234 batting average, 12 home run, 18 stolen base, 80 run, 62 RBI pace)?

A Hardball Times Update
Goodbye for now.

How about Angel Pagan (.250 batting average, seven home run, 35 stolen base, 78 run, 60 RBI pace), Bobby Abreu (.250 batting average, seven home run, 35 stolen base, 78 run, 60 RBI pace) or Torii Hunter (.242 batting average, 18 home run, five stolen base, 70 run, 82 RBI pace)?

Would you take him over Nationals outfielders Roger Bernadina or Michael Morse? Or how about even Laynce Nix? Or Pirates wildcard Jose Tabata (if healthy)? Would you trade Adam Dunn for him? Or Charlie Blackmon? On par with whom would you value Player X, who has produced an approximate .255 batting average, 18 home runs, 26.5 stolen bases, 82.5 runs, and 71 RBI “per season” (rated to 650 plate appearances)?

Make note of your answers to the above, and let’s dig a little deeper in to the month-by-month numbers. How do your value perceptions of Player X change, if at all, when I reveal his month-by-month production splits (NSB = Net Stolen Bases, or total steals minus caught stealing)?

Month 01 0.210 0.221 0.383 0.241 0.09 0.173 +2 0.254 44
Month 02 0.211 0.253 0.300 0.227 0.38 0.089 +2 0.246 38
Month 03 0.277 0.326 0.470 0.294 0.50 0.193 +7 0.356 118
Month 04 0.344 0.406 0.700 0.311 1.00 0.356 +5 0.471 196
Month 05 0.297 0.355 0.406 0.346 0.33 0.109 +1 0.330 99
Month 06 0.293 0.321 0.414 0.317 0.28 0.121 -1 0.310 86
Month 07 0.261 0.303 0.409 0.297 0.29 0.148 +4 0.313 89
Month 08 0.228 0.291 0.354 0.258 0.40 0.127 +4 0.297 78
Month 09 0.163 0.245 0.235 0.181 0.67 0.071 +2 0.228 34
Month 10 0.234 0.261 0.369 0.271 0.50 0.135 -1 0.271 63
Month 11 0.282 0.329 0.394 0.295 0.63 0.113 -1 0.303 85
TOTALS 0.255 0.302 0.398 0.272 0.41 0.144 +23 0.306 84

Noting particularly that if you omit Months 03 and 04 from Player X’s production totals, his “cumulative” triple-slash line plummets to .242/.285/.357 (.642 OPS) with home run and stolen base rates per 650 plate appearances of 14 and 21.5 (6.5 NSB), respectively, now what say you of this player?

Would you still roster this player? What is the most you would pay for him on draft day now?

Try to guess the player.

If you guessed Alex Rios, then you are correct. You just got #Rongeyed.

As always, leave the love/hate in the comments section below.

Jeffrey Gross is an attorney who periodically moonlights as a (fantasy) baseball analyst. He also responsibly enjoys tasty adult beverages. You can read about those adventures at his blog and/or follow him on Twitter @saBEERmetrics.
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
11 years ago

I do not understand the love for Rios in fantasy leagues. The guy is one of those players where the whole is far LESS than the sum of its parts. He’s always been an underachiever, and yet people continue to pay through the nose to own him. I’ve never owned the guy, and I doubt I ever will.

Jeffrey Gross
11 years ago


Well back when he was a .290/20/20 capable middle-of-the-orderish bat, he deserved the love. He’s like Choo in that regard. The wheels have fallen off, though, it seems.

He’s honestly not better than FraGu outside of R/RBI

11 years ago

To me, the only difference between Cruller Jim Hendry and Ken Williams is that one world championship. In 2005, everything went right for the White Sox up to and all the way through the postseason. In 2008, everything went right for the Cubs up to the playoffs, and then they played 3 games looking like rank amateurs, and that was that. Otherwise, Williams’ track record of overpaying older players for their decline phase seems even worse than Hendry’s, even though Jimbo gets absolutely killed for it on a daily basis.

Jeffrey Gross
11 years ago


Couldnt much disagree. I think KW is a very overrated GM. And he hates Albert Pujols….

11 years ago

I dunno, maybe people value Rios because for his CAREER he averages 15 hr and 21 sb for every 600 plate appearances.

Is that worthy of a #1 or #2 OF slot? No, and I can see bashing the idea.

Is he worthy of a #3 or #4 slot? Sure.

Since 2007 he’s top 20 in OF WAR.

He’s got to be one of the more polarizing figures in fantasy. Within a week I saw articles suggesting it was time to buy low, right after reading articles about how it is time to sell for whatever you can get.

Right now I have BJ Upton, Mike Stanton, Nick Swisher in my OF. Alex is #4 and I just need him to finish with average career numbers…not to bust out and go 30/30 all the sudden.

Is he a victim of not reaching FULL potential? Because he never developed into a perennial 30/30 OF that makes him worthless? I kinda don’t get it.

Jeffrey Gross
11 years ago

Rios, the point being, is not a worth OF in leagues that only employ 3OF. He’s not top 40 at the position. In real life, his value since coming to the sox has been entirely tied up in two months of production. Being at the tail of his prime, his Sox stats ain’t gonna git any better without some serious swings in luck. He’s undone all the steps forward he took in his walk rate on the Jays, and while he’s been striking out less than coming to the Sox, his speed and power have been on a gradual decline. Take his May/April 2010 numbers out of the picture and Rios’ speed score for 2010 aint so pretty

11 years ago

That makes sense JG. One of the problems with current-day fantasy banter is the variety of leagues out there and how much it impacts a player’s value.

I’m used to 12 team league, 5 OF. Rios would have dramatically different value in a 10 team/3 OF setup.

Jeffrey Gross
11 years ago


Agree. I tend to write for 60 OF leagues, but there are a lot of 12 tm, 3 OF lgs too. I’m in a pair myself. I think Rios is a borderline OF5. He’s got upside, but his draft day cost was near/north $20. He’s really only worth $7ish at most

Kevin Wilson
11 years ago

Wells has 10 home runs this year. Perhaps you meant a 20 HR pace, not a 30?

Kevin Wilson
11 years ago

Oh, I see, you were doing the numbers on a “if they played 162” pace? Is that really the fairest way to represent a player at this point in the season?

Jeffrey Gross
11 years ago


Whenever I talk about a player’s pace, I extrapolate it per 650 PA because it gives the best sense of what the player is capable of. Saying that Wells is on pace for 20 misrepresents time missed, etc. By pacing him per 650 PA, you know “the type” of player he is better. It’s just a more sensible, universal baseline

HR Resume
11 years ago

Resume writing is quite boring…but the given resume samples saved my time of searching on sites. It’s a nice blog for Freshers to write their first perfect attractive and accurate resume with your fabulous HR Resume Examples.

11 years ago

I suppose my only issue with the per 650 method is that it doesn’t lend itself kindly to platoon and other playing time issues. However, I do agree that it is the best representation, when keep such things in mind.